Monthly Archives: July 2006

Protagonists of Spin

[Editor’s Note: I reproduce this letter sent 8 years ago to Kevin Rudd who was then Shadow Foreign Minister. It was sent by an up-and-coming member of the ALP and energetic supporter of the ‘two-state-solution’. Subsequently Hizbollah did kick Israel out of Lebanon and Hamas did win a democratic election in Gaza despite a coup attempt by US backed Fatah faction leader Mohammed Dahlan. The US never liked the people getting their say. Both Rudd and his ALP critic both claimed to be in favour of the two-state solution [in Palestine, not Iraq (sic)]. Where lies there solution now, in a bomb crater in Gaza City? There is only silence from both the sender and the recipient of the letter. ]

***


Letter to Kevin Rudd from Labor member in 2006

Dear Kevin,
I must say I was disappointed in your biased response to the Lebanon/Israeli conflict on ABC radio this morning.

Yes, you are right to condemn oganisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah, but your failure to also condemn Israel for its collective punishment of the Lebanese people was very telling indeed.

You mentioned that Hezbollah has instigated this latest conflict – but is the response justified?
Isn’t there a real possibility that the relentless bombing of Lebanon could also result in the deaths of their two kidnapped soldiers ? Of course I would be a cynic to think that there is another agenda at play here – while this conflict or any other for that matter takes hold in the region, Israel doesn’t have to address its breaches of UN security resolutions in occupied territories, namely the West Bank and the wall it is constructing that will cut the Palestinian people into segments.

Have you condemned Israel for refusing to install a cease fire so as foreign nationals can leave safely – no ? Of course not (I apologise if I have missed your condemnation). Have you condemned Israel for attacks in Gaza unprovoked?

I will be the first to defend Israel’s right to security and peace, but Israel has got to withdraw to its defined borders and address the issues surrounding Palestine, this I believe will address many of the problems. This will I believe also help nullify the delusional who want to see the destruction of Israel – not forgetting there are previous Israeli PM’s who have sworn to never see a Palestinian homeland (no doubt for economic and biblical reasons).

Kevin, I was part of the Irish Army deployment in Southern Lebanon (UNIFIL) for almost 2 years between 1982 – 1990. I was there when Israel invaded in 1982, this resulted in the birth of Hezbollah, many Lebanese people expressed they were the only people to protect them from constant Israeli fire when I returned in 1997, hardly a day went by without Israel and her defacto forces firing (mainly small arms fire) into and at civilian and UN positions / locations – unprovoked.

Of course when (and very rarely did it happen) there was a response from the Lebanese side, it was met with a far greater response, it gave Israel the belief it was justified in its actions.

I have watched Israeli soldiers fire indiscriminately into houses that were occupied by only women and children and we were not equipped or mandated to prevent such actions – at times these actions resulted in civilian and UN casualties.

It is no wonder we (ALP members) are seen as hypocrites – then again far better that, than upsetting the US.

While all sides of the conflict have to take blame and share responsibility, the largest blame belongs to the rest of us – the international community, especially US foreign policy for allowing this to continue, if the international community wanted to solve this conflict it could, but regrettably we need the US to take a lead, but that is highly unlikely as it would be seen as criticising its own foreign policy as it contributes billions of US $ in military aid to Israel.

This is about far more than the capture of soldiers belonging to the IDF (Israel Defence Force) – after all, there are “kidnappings” on both sides.

If the Berlin Wall can come down, so can barriers preventing this conflict, but the longer it is allowed to continue, the higher the barrier will be set – then again, to remove the barrier will result in a Palestinian homeland free of economic persecution.

Yes, I know there are far more pressing issues for us (the Labor Party) here at home in the quest to remove the Howard government.

Regards
Name Redacted
Wed, 26 Jul 2006
[editor’s emphasis]

Open Letter to Kevin Rudd on the crisis in Lebanon and Gaza

Open letter to Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs

Thank you for your response to my phone call to Mr Rudd’s office this morning (27 July 2006).

If you wish to check again with Fleur of Mr Rudd’s electorate office, what I did say was that the shadow minister had spoken about the need for more embassy staff in Beirut but had not focused in those interviews on the terrible human rights abuses happening in Lebanon right now by the Israeli Defence Forces — a repeat of the abuses of the last invasion of Lebanon in 1982, on this occasion on a wider scale.

In a radio interview dated 24 JULY 2006 (11 days after Israel bombed the Beirut International Airport in Lebanon) that you forwarded to me, Mr Rudd said:

“We need to see a ceasefire which involves Hezbollah ceasing its rocket attacks on Israel, the return of Israeli troops that have been captured by Hezbollah and Israel itself ceasing all hostilities.”

Yet Mr Rudd did not seek an immediate ceasefire 11 days into the Israeli bombing causing so may lives to be lost.

What has Mr Rudd said of the return by Israel of the thousands of Lebanese and Palestinians held without trial in Israeli jails?

Mark Regev, Israeli Foreign Ministry Spokesman, stated on ABC Lateline (26 July 2006) that:

“I can say the following: we do not deliberately target civilian targets, whether they are Lebanese civilians or anyone’s civilians.”

A transparent lie after the ambulance and UN building attacks 2 days ago and the attacks on Lebanese civilians and Palestinians in Gaza over the past 14 days. Has Mr Rudd asked the Israeli government officials if it is official Israeli Defence Force policy to target Lebanese civilians? If not, why not?

Mr Rudd put the following spin on 14 days of massacre of Lebanese civilians by Israeli forces:

“A ceasefire is necessary. A ceasefire which involves Hezbollah ceasing its rocket attacks on Israel. A ceasefire which involves the return of Israeli troops. And on top of that a cessation of hostilities on the part of Israel itself.

What is Mr Rudd doing himself to get both Ms Rice and Mr Howard to call an immediate ceasefire? Has he threatened ALP withdrawal of bipartisan support for the US alliance? Has he called for the immediate withdrawal of Australian and American troops from Iraq under the treat of withdrawal of support for the US Alliance? Has he called for a withdrawal of ALP support for all US joint defence bases in Australia?

Why continue to support the US Alliance when so many lives have been lost through human rights abuses by the Americans and their ally, Israel, and so many more lives may be lost?

Ian Curr
Camp Hill QLD
27 July 2006

US, Australia, and Britain step up war in the Middle East

slide28.JPGPlease click on slide to the right to sign the petition supporting an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon and Palestine.
The two articles below show the hypocrisy of the diplomacy of the Australian, British and US governments in the Middle East. While calling for Israeli restraint both governments are directly involved in assisting Israel bombard Lebanon and Gaza by providing training, bombs, and logistical support to the Israeli Defence Forces.
The articles below testify to the complicity of these governments in Israeli war crimes.

Times Online July 27, 2006
US says Israel bomb flights did not break British rules
The United States has denied it contravened British air transport procedures by allowing two cargo aircraft loaded with bunker-busting bombs bound for Israel to stop over in Scotland.
The US Defence Department said Washington had double-checked its records of all flights since the reports emerged and found it has not broken any regulations in Britain or anywhere else.
British defence sources have alleged that the Airbus jets stopped to refuel at Glasgow’s Prestwick airport last weekend during a flight to transport GBU28 laser-guided bombs to Israel.
The matter is now being investigated by Britain’s Civil Aviation Authority.
The controversy comes amid a backdrop of mounting criticism in Britain over Tony Blair’s support for President Bush in refusing to call for an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon.
British officials are understood to be angry about the stop-overs and Margaret Beckett, the Foreign Secretary, is reported to have approached Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, to speak to her personally about the matter at yesterday’s ministerial conference in Rome.
Mrs Beckett said yesterday she was “not happy” about Washington failing to comply with procedures for such flights. “We have already let the United States know that this is an issue that appears to be seriously at fault, and we will be making a formal protest if it appears that that is what has happened,” she said. “It appears that insofar as there are procedures for handling that kind of hazardous cargo, irrespective of what they are, it does appear that they were not followed.” The Foreign Office has said it is still investigating the matter.
A US Defence Department spokesman, Joe Carpenter, said: “It’s our policy that US military flights and those contracted on our behalf comply with existing bilateral agreements. “There have been no recent deviations from those procedures.”

ABC Online 27 July 2006
US Air Force begins bombing missions in NT
The United States Air Force has given the first details of new long range missions that will see it dropping bombs on the Northern Territory in up to six separate exercises a year. The first exercise started on Tuesday, with two stealth aircraft flying non-stop return trips to Guam and releasing two concrete-filled bomb casings at the Delamere range near Katherine. Only one of the B-2 bombers has actually touched down in Australia, the others are being refuelled in the air. US Air Force Colonel Bob Wheeler says the stealth bombers can carry nuclear weapons, but that will not happen during the training exercises. “No. That will never be done. The weapons that we will be using here are the ones that are approved for your ranges,” he said. “And those do not include anything with depl- (sic) uranium or any kind of replicas or regular nuclear weapons. There will be nothing in that area.”

Israeli Spokesperson lies about UN and Ambulance Strikes

The Israeli spindoctor on the ABC’s Lateline (July 26 2006) lied unconvincingly about the bombing of the UN building and the ambulances in Southern Lebanon.
Here is a brief excerpt of what he said. Note that the Hizballah leader’s threats are canvassed at the end of the interview. This is a very worrying development. If Hizballah uses bigger rockets, the Israeli response could be a greater catastrophe than has already happened.

Tony Jones, Australian Broadcasting Corporation interview with MARK REGEV, ISRAELI FOREIGN MINISTRY SPOKESMAN on the bombing of the UN and ambulances in South Lebanon

TONY JONES: OK. How can you explain the attack on Sunday night reportedly by an Apache helicopter on that ambulance heading for Tyre in a convoy where an Israeli missile went straight through the centre of the Red Cross on the roof of the ambulance?

MARK REGEV: I’m sorry, but I haven’t been briefed on that particular event and so I don’t have a good answer for you.

TONY JONES: It’s on front page of the newspapers here in Australia and it’s received coverage all round the world because I’ve read it on the Internet.

MARK REGEV: I’m just not familiar with that event and I apologise and I can say the following: we do not deliberately target civilian targets, whether they are Lebanese civilians or anyone’s civilians. They are not our enemy. Ultimately, we hope for a day of peace with Lebanon. We are trying to deal with a very formidable military machine – that is the Hezbollah military structure. A machine, as your reporter from Lebanon says, continues to hurl missiles into Israeli civilian cities. A machine whose outposts, every time we take on one of their fortresses, we are losing some of our service people because they are well fortified, they are very well defended. Ultimately, I would say the following: this whole tragedy, this whole crisis, is a result of the fact that Hezbollah has initiated this conflict and that is why it is just so important that we implement UN Security Council resolution 1559 for calls for the disarming of Hezbollah as a military instrument.

TONY JONES: Let’s look at Sheik Hassan Nasrallah threatened today that his attacks would now go, as he put it, beyond Haifa. Do you understand what he means by that?

MARK REGEV: I am afraid so. I mean he is threatening us with missiles to go even deeper into Israel, maybe coming as far south as cities like Natania, getting close to Tel Aviv. We take these threats very seriously. We saw from day one of this crisis they had a formidable military machine, the way they took out our naval vessel with a very sophisticated land-to-sea missile…

For complete interview go to  http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2006/s1697956.htm
beirut.jpg

US military on trial at the Four Courts, Dublin

military-out-of-shannon.jpg

The Ploughshares group were acquitted of charges of criminal damage without lawful excuse of US military aircraft used in Iraq. The verdict was received at 12.14am 26 July 2006 EST this morning concerning this significant trial in The Four Courts.

However it was just another day for U.S. Secretary of State, Condolezza Rice, passing through Dublin. Dr Rice was on her way to shake hands with the Israeli Prime Minister and to give him the OK to continue the bombardment of Lebanon and Gaza.

Trial Diary.
Since their action on the 3rd February 2003 the five defendants have waited three years for todays verdict, under onerous bail conditions, with two other trials collapsing (Trial 1,Trial 2). In a statement released immediately after the verdict the Pitstop Ploughshares said:

The jury is the conscience of the community chosen randomly from Irish society. The conscience of the community has spoken. The government has no popular mandate in providing the civilian Shannon airport to service the

US war machine in it’s illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.
In 1996 in Liverpool the Jury acquittal of the four ‘ploughshares’ women contributed to the end of arms exports to the Suharto dictatorship in

Indonesia and the independence of East Timor.
The decision of this jury should be a message to London, Washington DC and the Dail that Ireland wants no part in waging war on the people of Iraq. Refuelling of US warplanes at Shannon Airport should cease immediately.

Pine Gap Trial?
So what awaits the Pine Gap Four in Alice Springs in October 2006 on their charges of trepass under the Defence (Special Undertakings) Act 1952?

Stop Israeli bombing of Lebanon and Gaza!

Eastern Busway — A real alternative

There are alternatives to putting busways underground and to building flyovers as a means of providing public transport. Rail was investigated in the 1990s and was ‘found’ to be too expensive and not supportable by population density and therefore demand in the eastern suburbs. But no one can produce a detailed analysis, so is this just a fob off by Translink?During a public consultation session at the Stones Corner library in July 2006, Translink representatives refused to talk about a rail alternative saying that their brief was to produce a busway. Translink do not want to talk to anyone who is canvassing options that they have already rejected or not considered fully.

In early 2006 there was a CATCH (local community group looking at public transport alternatives) meeting when a rail enthusiast got up and talked about the old Belmont Rail that came off the railway line just past Norman Park Station and went along the cutting on Oateson-Skyline Drive?

He mentioned that the cutting had already been built for rail in the 1920s.
With one flyover across Bennetts Road, a couple of tunnels and the use of light rail along the old Carina Tramway, a rail connection would be able to miss all the residents houses and provide a direct rail link along the old tramway at Carina to Carindale and Capalaba.

I have marked the route on the map. The rail enthusiast also talked about rail/bus hybrids. He should be consulted to find any further proposals he may have.

rail-alternative-to-eastern-busway-bt.jpg

If The Qld government improves the rail infrastructure (perhaps even adding another rail line) to Norman Park Station and then choose the route to Capalaba that I have shown on the map then you have the Translink problem of getting people to the CBD quicker without interfering with residents or building huge bus and road infrastructure. In my plan buses would be used locally to enable residents of the inner suburbs to get to the train quickly and easily.

Why not at least consider these suggestions? Because Translink has an agenda that opposed rail from the outset.
By the way, I think that the data I collected and analysed in the attached spreadsheet indicates that traffic congestion at Camp Hill is not the problem claimed by Translink in the discussion I had with them at the Stones Corner Library.

Social Cost
With a few exceptions, the worst traffic congestion occurs closer to the CBD than Camp Hill. This is degrading quality of life of the inner suburbs. Translink have ignored the social cost of the infrastructure they are building. The increased bus pollution near schools and shopping centres is one example of that social cost. That is why a clean, high volume, electric rail system is necessary in the eastern suburbs, to relieve the traffic congestion within 8 kms of the CBD.

Has Translink ever done a proper detailed study of demand for rail in the inner city?
My railway station, Cooparoo, is a very busy station and this is true of all the stations closer to CBD. Yet Cooparoo station has had minimal improvement in the past ten years. The parking is inadequate, the crossing at Cavendish Road is third world, and there are not enough pedestrian footways, buses or bikeways servicing this station.

Meeting with Refusenik

PUBLIC MEETING

With Rotem Dan Mor and Halim Rane

Tuesday July 25th

6.30pm for a 7pm start

Ahimsa House

Horan St West End

Please RSVP Emma on 0421 002 769

Speakers –

Rotem Dan Mor is a Conscientious Objector to compulsory army service in Israel. He served for a year and a half in the Israeli Army before refusing to continue to serve and spending time in prison for his choice. Since his release he has:

  • Toured Australia, New Zealand and the US speaking publicly on the Peace and Conscientious Objector movements in Israel-Palestine
  • Organised and facilitated programs for young people in Israel contemplating refusal to compulsory army service, with New Profile (feminist organization working to create a civil, demilitarized society in Israel) and American Friends Service Committee (Quakers)
  • Actively resisted the building of the Separation Wall

Halim Rane has been lecturing in Islamic Studies for the past five years. He has recently returned from a visit to Palestine and Israel. He was there to conduct field research for his PhD, which is in the field of conflict resolution, specifically focussing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Please assist us to promote this event by forwarding to your networks.
Many thanks,

Emma Davey
Projects Coordinator
Multicultural Centre for Mental Health & Well-Being (Harmony Place)
www.harmonyplace.org.au
ph (07) 3848 1600
m 0421 002 769

Plea from Lebanon

This slide show contains disturbing images of war.
It was forwarded to me by a friend from an aunt who lives in Lebanon, a nun in the Catholic order of the Sacred Heart.
Her request is simple – for Australians to demand that the Australian government support a call for a ceasefire in Lebanon.
aggressionagainstlebanon.pps

Stop the Attacks on Lebanon!

To see the flyer about the rally at 12 Noon in Queens Park in Brisbane on Saturday, 22 July 2006 download this pdf file

palestine-and-lebanon-rally-a5-version2.pdf

WorkChoices Rally

For a description of the 28 June 2006 Union rally against the WorkChoices legislation you can download the document below:

if-you-dont-fight-you-lose.doc

Israel declares war!

How humane and civilized!
Stole my land
Burned my trees
Jailed my sun
Killed my children
Drank their blood
Then ground their bones at McDonnell-Douglas
And offered them back to me
As a present
In a flour-sack
To torture me all my life
This is America
Nasri Hajjaj

For 50 years we have witnessed Israel trying to drive the Palestinian people from their homeland.

Israeli military used superior US technology to harass and kill the Palestinian people.

Today, in Gaza, the Palestinians have lost water, power, and shelter.

Someone said yesterday that Israel want Palestinians to live in tents. But it is more than that.

Israel is trying to drive the people out of Palestine.
It is collective punishment, genocide.

Today is Black Thursday.

You will hear more about this on the mass media but today Israel has bombed the Beirut International Airport.

It has continued bombing numerous bridges, a power station and other infrastructure in Lebanon that it started yesterday.

In truth, Israel has declared another war on the Lebanese people.

Israeli military said this about about the International Airport in Beirut the “the goal of the attack was to shut down air traffic in and out of the Lebanese capital.”

See Reports at http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Lebanon/200720 and http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1685927.htm.

 Ian Curr
13 July 2006

Rally against IR Laws – 28 June 2006

Ignorance of a worse world to come?
Unions at SouthBank Cultural Forecourt

The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s chief executive, Peter Hendy, declared the national protest a failure, as he claimed the union movement only managed to mobilise 2% of Australian workers. Under the front organisation, Employers First, East Timor-style counter demonstrations were planned against the unions – you know to hold up pro-Australian Workplace Agreement signs, to throw abuse at the unionists – nothing major like burning down union buildings, not yet anyway. Luckily the federal Industrial relations minister, Kevin Andrews, called the counter demos off at the last moment when he realised he could not even get his kids (who are share traders) to make up the numbers at the bosses demos.

In Brisbane, the best the employers could do was to have one fellow standing at the bottom of the hill going up to Roma St parklands with the sign, “It’s my right to choose an AWA.” When I saw him I wondered if he perhaps was the sole representative of the Employer First counter demonstration. The consensus amongst the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) crowd was that he was either a self-employed businessman, or a (slightly deranged) Liberal Party supporter. The meatworkers’ comment in passing was: “Wait until the construction workers see him.”

In fact, a retired member of the Australian Services Union (Clerks) commented that she saw a big ruckus with a whole group of CFMEU members abusing a man with a sign, and a group of police apparently running to his rescue. She had not been able to see what it was all about, but it turned out to be the deranged AWA supporter. The Qld coppers hung around to defend this guy’s civil liberties right to the end of the march, even as the “Workers of all Countries Unite” banner went by.

One thing that I noticed about the rally was that there were a lot of women (see photo below). I think this is because women are direct casualties of the WorkChoices legislation arising from their precarious job security. Womens’ work is highly casualised and temporary. I do not think wages is the issue. I think it is job security. Managers and employers are using the new legislation to ramp up the bullying of workers in the psychological warfare produced by the government.

What are unions doing to focus on this?

There needs to be some defining moment when the issue of AWAs (currently conducted by the union leadership largely in an abstract and intellectual debate) becomes an organised struggle of opposition by workers.

The Spotlight case is a clear example of how not to conduct an industrial campaign with union officials and the ALP getting into media debates about the accuracy of the amount of money that workers are losing. Did you see that the SDA official, Joe de Bruyn, sided with Andrews on this issue? The SDA do not need members, they have enough accumulated wealth to function without union dues.

Both the Electrical Trades Union (ETU) and the Construciton Forestry Mining and Engineering Union (CMFEU) were the best organised contingents in the march. The SDA contingent was quite large and as you would expect had a lot of women in it. The ETU had a small rally in the carpark at the Boundary hotel in West End after the march. Did you hear the ETU blokes saying that they have declared the old ALP pub, the Terminus hotel, “black” because all the staff there have just been put on AWAs by management. And there is Beazley taking 10 years to come out against AWAs!

The ETU got Tommy Radonikis to speak at the Boundary. Chartered buses were waiting to take the workers to and from the pub. The ETU way of organising in a group is the way to go.

There was one aspect of the Brisbane march on the day that I am curious about.

The QCU had marshals placed at the Southbank Cultural Forecourt on the Victoria Street end just prior to the march at about 12:30pm.

It was the marshalls’ job to organise each union contingent to join the march in a orderly fashion. WorkLife were at the head of the march. They were followed by the Rail Tram & Bus Unions, AWU, AMIEU, Queensland Services Union the ETU, Builders labourers Federation (BLF), ASU and so on.

However as the marshals were waving on the National Union of Workers (NUW) to join the march, the Socialist Alliance contingent joined in the march in front of the CFMEU.

Personally I marched with a small group at the end of the march behind “Workers of all Countries Unite” banner.

This included a few wharfies who did not have an MUA contingent to march with. The lack of an organised MUA contingent in the march did not seem to tally with Combet’s claim at the rally afterwards that the MUA dispute in 1998 was a victory for the union.

No matter what union officials say, many union members like those wharfies feel comfortable with slogans like Workers of All Countries Unite.

They too had no truck with the coppers or the pro-AWA protestor. Banter like “even the SDA could not support that guy”. These workers were so comfortable marching behind this banner they ended up carrying it at the end of the march.

Why is there not some attempt by workers political organisations involved in the struggle to organise a red contingent at the end of the march in November 2006?

Ian Curr
5 July 2006