Anti-Terrorism Laws

Here is an excellent summary of  new ‘anti-terrorism’ laws in Australia by Bevan Ramsden (APAN). Recently a regular WBT correspondent claimed that:

Manning & Assange were sold out by the anti-war movement that incited & abandoned them.

Please note that WBT is NOT trying to incite people, ours is an appeal to reason.


The Anti-Terrorism Act and other Acts strip us of many civil liberties we thought we had.

Never has an Australian government talked so much about freedom while doing so much to undermine it. When it comes to national security and refugees we are increasingly pathetic, writes Ben Saul.

Ben Saul is Professor of International Law at The University of Sydney.

He has written on this subject as follows:

“The truth is that Australia already has enough laws to deal with terrorism. Since 9/11 the Parliament has been amongst the most hyperactive and invasive counter-terrorism law-makers on the planet. Much of it is never used, or goes too far – from preventive police detention, to ASIO’s incommunicado detention of non-suspects, to control orders.

The new laws also go too far. They criminalise innocent travel to places the Foreign Minister does not want you to go. They criminalise free speech. They criminalise whistle-blowers and the media that report them. They allow mass surveillance of innocent Australians on the internet. They deny procedural fairness. They violate the right to social security and therefore potentially leave people destitute.

All of this comes without the binding human rights safeguards that every other self-respecting democracy imposes on its security agencies.”

Prof George Williams , Dean of Law, University of NSW spoke last year at a meeting of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties  and made the following points:

Under the Terrorism Act:

  1. The possession of a “thing” that could be used for a terrorist act is punishable by 15 years in jail.  “Thing” is not defined. It could be a pamphlet.
  2. The definition of terrorism as causing widespread harm is very wide and could be interpreted as including protest against the government.
  3. Joining or attempting to join an organisation that is a “prohibited organisation” carries a jail term of 15 years even if you don’t do anything.
  4. The Act gives ASIO power to detain for questioning a person who is not connected to any crime but is detained for intelligence; and can be held for up to 7 days
  5. Metadata on persons can be accessed by government without a warrant.
  6. There are a range of laws which allow searches without a warrant
  7. ASIO can ignore criminal law except for torture
  8. Any journalist who writes a story about a particular use of these laws can be subject to jail for 5 years
  9. The government can remove a citizen even if a court makes no finding of guilt but the government believes a crime has been committed.

In the witness- K case, the court is closed and the judicial officer is required to give the greatest weight to the protection of the community over the right of the individual to a fair trial.

In the United States much of this Australian Terrorist Act would be illegal because the United States has a Bill of Rights protecting individuals from such laws.

We do not have such a Bill of Rights (USA) or Charter of Rights (UK) in Australia, although a survey has showed that 61% of  Australians think we have one.

The ALP has on its policy platform consideration of a national bill of rights.

The survey also showed that a surprisingly high number of  Australians think they can take the 5th Amendment to protect themselves from being required to say something which might later be used in  court against them. The 5th Amendment is part of the US Constitution not Australia’s.  Perhaps this finding says something about the influence of American TV dramas such as SVU and NCIS on  community thinking.

Regulations banning protests and gatherings in public places

The NSW Council for Civil Liberties released a media statement in June, 2018 condemning regulations banning public gatherings. An extract from its statement reads as follows:

“On 1 July 2018, new regulations came into effect, granting the NSW State Government incredibly wide powers to disperse or ban protests, rallies, and virtually any public gathering across approximately half of all land across the state. CCL strongly opposes these regulations……

On 16 March last year, the NSW State Government published the Crown Land Management Regulation 2018 (NSW). Included was a provision which provided that public officials would have broad power to “direct a person” to stop “Taking part in any gathering, meeting or assembly”……

Police, Local Council officials, and even so-far unspecified categories of people or government employees will have the power to ban people from holding public gatherings on public land. The territory where these incredibly broad powers apply are called Crown Land – land owned by the State Government. This includes town squares, parks, roads, beaches, community halls and more.”

One member of the Marrickville Peace Group on Armistice Day was “escorted” by police away from the War Memorial in Hyde Park, Sydney and told by the police to stay away from the War Memorial for 6 hours. He was wearing around his neck a sign simply saying: “Honour the dead by ending war”

Bevan Ramsden

One thought on “Anti-Terrorism Laws

  1. 'The Afghan Files' and ABC nonsense says:

    ABC Chair, Ita Buttrose (a former Packer employee), came out against the AFP/government raids on the ABC … good on her.

    But does Ms Buttrose really wish to defend News Corp, purveyor of lies and deceit that unashamedly defended the Morrison bid for PM?

    It is hard to defend the public broadcaster when you hear how ABC journos portray the ‘constitutional crisis’ in Venezuela. The ABC’s Fran Kelly actually quoted Angelina Jolie on Radio National this morning as if she was an expert of Venezuela and why it is in crisis.

    Whatever your criticism of the Venezuelan government Maduro was either elected or he wasn’t. The UN says he was. There have been no fewer than 6 elections since 2011. Surely that is enough elections for anyone? The Australian government supports the orchestrated coup by Washington, why? Australia has had 5 Prime Ministers in the last 6 years. How many Presidents or Prime Ministers do the people need?

    Regarding the ‘Afghan files’ :

    1) Who were the Australian Generals who ordered the murder of civilians in Afghanistan?
    2) Who else is on the General’s list for assassination?
    3) Who authorized ABC lawyers to hand over the 9,000+ emails to the AFP?
    4) Does the government/AFP’s have a mole(s) inside the ABC? If so, who are they?

Please comment down below