New Parks Laws come into effect

PArkslaw1On 9th September, the Brisbane city council approved a draft for a new local law called the ‘Public Land and Council Assets Local Law’ (PLACA), by proposing to combine eleven different local laws into one.

The PLACA, which changes the way activities are managed in parks, malls and council lands including roads, bush-lands and sport fields, is under the public consultation period until Friday, 10th October, 2014.

Local Councilor, Cr. Helen Abrahams of the Gaba ward, affirms that South Brisbane and West End does not have sufficient green spaces to cope up with the predicted population growth, and will have only 17ha of parklands with council under the acquisition program, while these suburbs should have 40ha.

“I am opposed to this law as it has two outcomes. First, large groups in parks may have to book a park for the event, 20 days in advance and may even have to pay for the park booking. Second, if they do not have a park booking, they can be moved on by the verbal instruction of a Council officer,”  Cr. Abrahams said.

“The new local law reinforces that it is illegal to sleep in a park. This means that a homeless person is at risk of being fined. I would hope that this does not happen but the Local Law certainly gives Council the power to fine a person for sleeping in a park. Council argues that this power is necessary to stop the campervans in our parks,” she added.

A new compliance and oral direction powers for council officers, authorizes the council to revoke their consent in two ways – by a written notice or by giving an oral direction, where they can tell people to “stop the conduct”, “leave the Council land” or “take specified actions to avert or remedy the contraventions”.

Currently there are no immediate processes for reviewing the oral direction in the local law.

According to a council spokesman, most activities in parks will not require permits.

“Brisbane has an extensive and expanding network of over 2000 parks. Council cares for and manages these valuable assets for residents and visitors to share in a safe and friendly environment.  Brisbane is a growing city with increasing demands on our parks.  Council is considering a range of measures that will help activate our city and ensure parks remain accessible and safe for all to use,” he said.

“Residents can still use Council parks free of charge, as has always been the case.  The only time that a fee will be required is if people are booking a designated area in a park for exclusive use or for some commercial purposes. This is the current process and has not changed.   Refundable bonds will continue to be required for certain activities.  As is currently the case, a permit fee will only be charged for activities requiring the exclusive use of a designated park site or for some commercial purposes,” he added.

All Council permits will be available online or by calling the council’s Call Centre.

A permit will be required for any activity which meets any one of the council’s standard permit criteria such as exclusive use of a designated site, access to and use of council power sources, or erecting, placing or maintaining any structure or fixture.

Certain activities such as Public speaking, use of remote controlled devices ( children’s toys are excepted ), busking (unamplified) or Parkour are categorized as activities that may have a potential impact on the park or other users, and thus a free permit may be necessary.

Whereas some activities that may require a fee and will automatically require a Council assessed permit, due to the possible impact they may impose on the park or other users are weddings, parties and other private gatherings requiring a guaranteed exclusive use of a site, markets or fairs, commercial filming and photography or commercial health and fitness activities.

Jonathan Sri, the greens Candidate for next year’s South Brisbane by-election, suspects that these proposed laws are based on an underlying ideology that governments need to carefully control people in order to discourage conflict.

While he is concerned about some of the less-discussed ramifications of these rules, including their impacts on homeless people, and their potential to restrict citizens’ freedom of assembly and free speech. He believes that it has been drafted so broadly that council could even use them to penalize and fine anyone who tries to protest against the council.

“They’re not evil people, but it’s in their nature to want to have as much control over other people and public spaces as possible. I expect they’ll use their new powers strategically. They’ll still allow some public protests since they don’t want to be perceived as totalitarian, but they’ll make it more expensive and more bureaucratic to get a permit. And if ever there’s a particular event or protest that they have a serious problem with, they’ll have the power to crack down on it,” Mr. Sri said.

“ The new laws even have strict prohibitions against handing out leaflets without council approval. This means someone could be fined for standing in a park and handing out flyers that complain about the Brisbane City Council. That’s definitely not in the public interest,” he added.

“It seems, BCC councilors have an ideological agenda to privatize and corporatize our public spaces. They don’t like the idea that richer people pay rates so that poor people can use public services like parks, for free. In their ideal world, you have to pay for everything yourself, and if you can’t afford to, tough luck.”

Mr. Sri is organizing a public event called ‘the Last big picnic’ on 10th October at the Musgrave Park to celebrate the final moments of the right to use public spaces without council consent, before the council passes the law.

The new law may impact various ethnic communities and especially unions since it will increase the cost of holding union events, limit unions abilities to hold immediate rallies or fundraisers and put additional pressure on organizers to confirm the attendance numbers for rallies.

Under the new law, a person may be fined 50 penalty points or $5,692.50, if a person fails to obtain a required consent or if a person fails to comply with an oral direction. 20 penalty points or $2,277 for not producing a consent on demand by an authorized person, if the person is acting under a consent.

The public consultation on this draft will close on Friday, 10th October 2014. Any disapprovals can be lodged as a submission through the council’s formal process via http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/laws-permits/local-laws/register-local-laws-notices or a submission can be e-mailed to CEO@brisbane.qld.gov.au

Offline disapprovals can be made through the local councilor or the state MP.

Sam Navin 1 October, 2014

2 thoughts on “New Parks Laws come into effect

  1. Peaceful Assembly vs Local laws says:

    Everything I say below relates to democratic rights (the rights of groups to organise) and not to civil liberties which relates to the rights of individuals.

    At law to hold any public assembly or rally, you must comply with the Peaceful Assembly Act 1992. Currently there is a permit system that was always opposed by the democratic rights movement during the street march ban from Sept 1977 to July 1979. However the system, in practice, is sometimes more like a notification because the onus falls on the police to go to court if they wish to oppose the march. It is ironic that to have a march the coppers insist that you have enough people and if you have more than 50 you will now be caught by the park permit system that governs BCC property (or assets as council now refers to parks).

    The police or local authority may apply to a Magistrates Court for an order refusing to authorise the holding of the assembly. So council already has the power to do this and can call in the cops to enforce it. Interestingly council did not bother to do that, it simply ignored the Peaceful Assembly Act and used chapter 9 of the Local Laws to evict the Occupy movement from the CBD. Council simply made a unilateral decision to issue infringement notices like this one:

    The point raised by Hamish about local laws not being able to override Peaceful Assembly laws was not challenged in court by Occupy Brisbane when cops arrested people who refused to leave.

    Equally the council did the same thing at Paniyiri, they simply made an order based on their trusteeship of the land that makes up Musgrave Park. The cops then arrested anyone who remained in the park.

    I think the two pieces of legislation (Peaceful Assembly Act 1992 and Public Land and Council Assets Local Law 2014) are to be used to complement each other and thereby to further restricted public assembly. Whether that is the law or not I don’t know but unless it is challenged we will never know …. council and government will simply encroach more on democratic rights to organise.

    The BCC website explains the hoops you have to get through to have a public assembly in a park. Also it will depend on how the government, police and council intend to enforce the laws. A litmus test will be the permit application for activities in Musgrave Park during G20 that was submitted a couple of days ago. See below …

    Local Laws
    If you want to hold your assembly or rally in a Brisbane City Council park (includes King George Square and Musgrave Park), you must complete the following three forms:

    Notice of Intention to Hold an Assembly/Procession using Council facilities form
    – CA10171 (PDF – 40kb)
    Park bookings application form – CC10190 (PDF – 38kb)

    Notice of Intention to Hold a Public Assembly/Procession form (phone Queensland Police on 07 3364 6272 for this form)… see http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/facilities-recreation/parks-venues/parks/peaceful-assembly.

    Ian

  2. The Peaceful Assembly Act 1992, which overides any BCC law, prevents any fees or charges or other costs to anyone holding a peaceful assembly. So these new laws do not effect protests. People should get familiar with the Peaceful Assembly Act and correct the misinformation being spread by people who should know better that ‘Council is now banning or charging for protests’.

Please comment down belowCancel reply