Going to war?

Australians for War Powers Reform (AWPR) has launched a No War Without Parliament campaign so any decision to take Australia into international armed conflict should be made by our Parliament, not by the PM or the Executive. I read ‘No War without Parliament’. I understand this may be seen as an improvement on the current situation where Australian Prime Ministers from both major parties have authorised wars (Howard/Iraq) or the continuance of wars (Gillard/Afghanistan) but I think the proponents have missed a crucial aspect of why Australia gets involved in wars in the first place.

Why would any thinking person authorise parliament to make the right call when it gave bilateral support to the war in Afghanistan and the armed forces were led into that conflict by a war criminal? Over one in three Australians do not vote for the major parties that are rusted on supporters of the United States.

Peter Cosgrove led Australian military in three wars, The first was about gas (Timor Leste); the second was about oil (Iraq) and the third was about US imperialism in Asia (Afghanistan).

Has AWPR forgotten the Vietnam War? It was an Australian parliament that went ‘all the way with LBJ’.
Before the parliament is given any authority to go to war surely it must show that it has adopted foreign policy independent of the United States. And lest we forget how the Australian government has offerd up Julian Assange as a sacrificial lamb to the American slaughter. We post the article ‘This Anzac Day, ADF Veterans Call on Government for War Powers Reform‘ by Paul Gregoire. – Ian Curr, 1 May 2022.


This Anzac Day, ADF Veterans Call on Government for War Powers Reform

No war without Parliament

Anzac Day is a moment when the Australian public collectively pauses to contemplate the Australia Defence Force personnel who fell in conflicts on foreign soil.

The futility of war is particularly pertinent this year with the brutality of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Although, the seven-year-long Saudi-backed devastation in Yemen should also serve as reason for reflection.

And this Anzac Day, a number of ADF veterans and their families are calling on the federal government to finally deliver on the long called for reforms to the current approval process for Australian troops to be deployed to fight in foreign conflicts abroad.

Published yesterday, the veteran’s appeal open letter is undersigned by 160-odd people with the backing of former Defence Force Chief Admiral Chris Barrie.

It requests parliamentarians take action to remove the decision for Australians to go and fight overseas from being the sole domain of the PM.

The letter outlines that ADF personnel swear an “oath of allegiance to protect” our nation “from armed attack”.

Yet, in contemplating the decades-long invasion of Afghanistan, which Australia was a party to, it would seem the only protection provided was for the profits of big arms dealers.

“We urge you, our parliamentarians, to demand that any proposal for Australian involvement in overseas wars receives scrutiny in parliament followed by your vote,” the letter reads, adding that this would ensure “the widespread support of the Australian people”.

An antiquated system

The ability to send Australian troops overseas is called war powers. Based on a centuries-old UK royal practice, the decision to go to war is not made by parliament and doesn’t even involve any debate.

Indeed, it’s the sole decision of the National Security Committee of Cabinet.

Right now, the war cabinet consists of eight senior ministers: Scott Morrison, Barnaby Joyce, Josh Frydenberg, Marise Payne, Peter Dutton, Simon Birmingham, Karen Andrews and Michaelia Cash. And it’s understood, that if a decision is to be made, and the PM wants to deploy, all else follow.

As Australians for War Powers Reform president Dr Alison Broinowski told Sydney Criminal Lawyers this time last year, her organisation is calling for a reform to the Defence Act 1903 (Cth), so “the prime minister of the day cannot simply ask the defence minister to send the troops abroad”.

It would be modified in such a way to say that only after there has been a vote in both houses of parliament in favour of sending troops overseas that they can be sent,” she continued, and went on to explain that this would in turn engage public opinion in the decision-making process.

Lest we forget

The open letter outlines that ADF personnel don’t only die on the battlefield, as a disproportionate number later take their own lives. 

While those who are killed or suffer permanent injuries in foreign conflicts often do so for reasons that have no direct benefit for civilians here or on those foreign soils.

There is an election looming. And federal Labor made a commitment in April last year, that if it takes power, the party will establish a public inquiry to look into the war powers process and how it might be reformed for the better.

While on the other side, since this time last year, defence minister Peter Dutton has made ever-increasingly provocative remarks about going to war with China, while PM Scott Morrison has involved our nation in the AUKUS pact, which has as its primary focus potential conflict with Beijing.

Paul Gregoire
Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Please comment down below