Category Archives: Categories

Editorial Comment on current issues

Something remarkable is happening in Indian country

Editor’s Note.

Les Malezer has sent this interesting article around and so I reprint it here. I hope the National Geographic Society do not mind, I notify the editor of that magazine and credit the author (Charles Bowden) and photographer (Jack Dykinga) here. This may infringe copyright, I don’t know but the force of the article begs that it be distributed widely. I have hyperlinked the title so that the reader can view it from its source. Workers BushTelegraph is a not-for-profit website funded by my humble public service pension.

Part of my motivation in reprinting this is that I am reminded of my great grandfather, EM Curr who went to Bangerang (Yorta Yorta) country in northern Victoria near the Murray and Gouldburn Rivers . Colonial capitalism brought the sheep farmer, the squatter who settled on the Campaspe plains. By 1851 they had built roads, bridges, houses introduced stock and built three big towns in the Murray Gouldburn region. These people were known to the Bangerang and to each other.

Taken from Recollections of Squatting in Victoria by EM Curr

On their heels came mining capital with gold miners who dug holes in Bangerang land – the squatters called these people  ‘new chums’ but thought of them as blow ins.

One spruicker, a tall burley good-tempered looking Scot held forth on the wharf at Tongala one morning in January 1854 inveighing against the new comers:

‘Why these new chums who have overrun the country seem to think by George! that they are the first comers here and that … (all the things we built ) … grew of themselves like gum-trees”

How quickly we forget the first nation owners of the land who looked after it for centuries… the high court showed its collective amnesia in the Yorta Yorta case. Similarily the Queensland government is in denial about the Quandamooka claim on Minjerribah.

Any way have a read of the article and draw your own conclusions about what should be done about this collective alzheimers disease and how.

Ian Curr
August 2010

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[Aboriginal News] from Les Malezer

National Geographic Society
September 2010 Photograph by Jack Dykinga

Native Lands

Something remarkable is happening in Indian country:

Tribes whose lands were once taken from them are setting an example for how to restore the environment.

By Charles Bowden

The Santa Clara Pueblo is among a growing number of tribes across the United States—of 564 recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)— making moves to bring back land crushed over generations of human use.
Native American reservations cover 55 million acres of land (compared with 84 million acres controlled by the National Park Service), though most of these acres are not managed as wilderness or wildlife preserves. But something remarkable is emerging in Indian country. Those whose lands were once taken from them, those once dominated, often brutally, by the U.S. government, are setting an example for how to steward the environment.

In 1979 the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Montana became the first in the nation to set aside tribal land—92,000 acres of the Flathead Reservation’s mountains and meadows—as wilderness. Since then, the Nez Perce have acquired 16,286 acres of ancestral lands in northeast Oregon that they will manage solely to benefit fish and wildlife. The Assiniboine and Sioux tribes in northeasternMontana are working to bring back bison on the Fort Peck Reservation. In Minnesota the Chippewa, or Ojibwa, have restored a ravaged walleye population at Red Lake. And on the Fort Apache Reservation in Arizona the threatened Apache trout is finding a new home, and the forest is now managed with ecology, not just lumber, in mind.

Santa Clara Pueblo’s conservation program had an unlikely beginning. Late one evening in May 2000 a controlled burn to remove underbrush in nearby Bandelier National Monument went awry. The so-called Cerro Grande fire wound up devouring 235 buildings in the towns of Los Alamos and White Rock and eating more than 47,000 acres, including the upper part of Santa Clara Canyon. The fire even spread to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, though no radiation was reported to have
been released from its nuclear facilities. When the smoke cleared, the Santa Clara Pueblo closed the canyon, long a tourist attraction, and announced that it would take over management of its land from the BIA.

Today the scent of pine and juniper floats in the morning air under a blue sky. The valley rolls out a green tongue of trees in the slot canyon, tracing a path toward the Valles Caldera. The tribe has removed the invasive, exotic tamarisk and Siberian elm and Russianolive from 650 acres along the Rio Grande and restored 75 acres of
wetland. In the burn area above the canyon 1.7 million seedlings have been planted, including ponderosa pine, Douglas fir, blue spruce, Engelmann spruce, and white fir. Where Turkey Creek joins the main stream, the signs of elk are everywhere—gnawed bark on wind-felled aspen, droppings in the snow—and ancient beaver dams molder under recent growth. Fifteen years ago the last beaver left this canyon. Now the tribe hopes that with the restoration of streamside growth, the beaver will return and once again start the cycle of dams, ponds, and eventually, as silt fills the impoundments, meadows—a rhythm as old as the mountains.

The pueblo’s recreation director, Stanley Tafoya, says simply, “What we are trying to do is restore our resources. The older people want their grandkids to enjoy the canyon we once knew.”

That said, there is no Eden to restore. The North American landscape encountered by European invaders was hardly a pristine wilderness. Early human hunters may have helped wipe out mammoths and other megafauna at the end of the Ice Age. For thousands of years after that, Native Americans manipulated the land for their own needs with dams, canals, and fields. They regularly cut and burned the forests to clear land for farming and hunting.

In modern times, some tribal lands became littered with junk, and a few tribes opened solid-waste dumps to bolster their income. In Santa Clara Canyon the disappearance of the beaver was almost certainly hastened by tribal members. Even today, the land is grazed by the tribe’s cattle. But in the hope of restoring the streamside vegetation and the beaver, the tribe has begun fencing livestock out of wetland areas and adopted a grazing management plan.

Where conservation efforts are gaining ground, they’re often funded by cash from gambling and other enterprises. The Santa Clara Pueblo, for instance, owns and operates a hotel-casino, the Black Mesa Golf Club, and the Dreamcatcher Cinema in nearby Espanola. And of course some native people are as disconnected from the land as the typical American suburbanite, driving giant pickup trucks and killing the dark hours watching DVDs. Yet this is a culture that has lived close to the
land for centuries and whose elders tell stories that reach into a time beyond the imagination of industrial civilization. There remains a faith among Native Americans that they can rediscover the ground where their ancestors knew how to talk to gods.

On a stretch of foggy coast 200 miles north of San Francisco, less than 2 percent of the original old-growth redwoods survived the relentless logging of a few decades ago. The trees did better than the native people, who were hunted and slaughtered in the exuberance following the mid-19th-century gold rush. Their land was eventually claimed by timber companies. Now the tribes that formed a consortium to protect the land are working together to steward and restore 3,900 acres of the Sinkyone wilderness along the Lost Coast—lost because Highway 1 is forced inland here by the rugged terrain. At Sinkyone they have established a precedent—an intertribal wilderness area where trees will never be commercially harvested again.

The ground underfoot is brown litter. The trees tower, and everything is shadow. For a long time the Lost Coast was lost to Europeans. Early Spaniards couldn’t find a decent harbor and were beaten back by storms. Before settlers arrived, the Sinkyone Indians lined the valleys with villages, made redwood dugout canoes that featured carved lungs and hearts, and rode the waters hunting sea lions and other beasts. They saw the giant trees as fellow members of the community, the condor as a messenger from on high. The Sinkyone are a people who “fix the world” every year through a series of ceremonies. One of their stories is that the creator made the world and patted everything down, and then “bad men were not satisfied and tore it down, tore up the ocean banks, tore up the trees, tore down the mountains. Since
that time we have had to sing and dance every year to make it right again,” according to tribal beliefs.

Sally Bell was ten years old on the morning 150 years ago when white men came to her home near Needle Rock. They wiped out her family and cut out her baby sister’s heart, which they tossed into the brush where Sally hid. “I didn’t know what to do. I was so scared that I guess I just hid there a long time with my little sister’s heart in my hands.” When Sally’s words were finally taken down in the late 1920s, the visiting anthropologist described her as “blind, senile, sees spirits in rafters.”

Sally Bell’s name became a rallying cry in the 1980s, when the Georgia-Pacific lumber company sought to topple some of the last surviving old redwoods in a 90-acre grove that now memorializes her.

Environmentalists chained themselves to trees, the cutting stopped, and then something like change came to the Lost Coast. In 1985 a court ruling put an end to clear-cutting on 7,100 acres of timberland, about half of which was added to Sinkyone Wilderness State Park. Native people, loggers, and environmentalists sat down to help thrash out a plan for the other half. The original agreement set aside some areas as reserves, with the remainder to be harvested after a few decades of rest. But the tribes held out for a different plan.

Priscilla Hunter, one of the founders of the InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council, put her foot down and insisted that the land simply not be exploited again—a stance that almost destroyed the agreement and led to ill feeling. After years of meetings and with a heavy dose of obstinacy, the council became the leading force in the
efforts of various state parks and nonprofits to retire patches of woodland so that the historic forests could return.

In 1997, after more than a century of dispossession, the council acquired the 3,900 acres of Sinkyone land and turned it into the country’s first intertribal wilderness area. “It was time for ou people to get land back so that we could protect it,” Hunter says.

“The coastline and the redwood forests are sacred to the tribes. That’s where our people gather food and medicines, and the mountains are a place of ceremony where we can go and feel the power of our Mother Earth. The elder redwood trees are very powerful to us in a spiritual way.”

In cooperation with California State Parks, the council is restoring a stream known as Wolf Creek, which runs through nearby Wheeler, an abandoned logging town, in hopes of beckoning back a salmon run. Old logging roads have been removed by the council and the state parks and the land is beginning to heal. Upon a low ridge, redwoods twist and writhe, their limbs shaped by winds off the sea, almost a chorus of wood singing songs that modern humans are only slowly learning to hear.

Across the continent in southern Florida, another tribe once pegged for extermination is trying something similar. During the 20th century about half of the Big Cypress Swamp and the neighboring Everglades was destroyed for cities and farms. Invasive trees such as the melaleuca and the Brazilian pepper threaten what remains. A federal and state plan signed into law in 2000 promised a massive effort to revive the wetlands by restoring more natural water patterns, but until recently the plan remained stalled for lack of funding. So the Seminole Indians developed their own Everglades initiative, electing to take 2,100 acres of Big Cypress Reservation land, systematically remove the invaders, flood it to approximate what were once normal flows, and bring back some of the wild ground.

For tribal members, the Big Cypress Swamp and the Everglades are rare relics of the very earth that once saved them from genocide. When the Spanish first landed in Florida during the expedition of Juan Ponce de León in 1513, the area was home to 250,000 natives, whom the Spanish came to call cimarrones, meaning “wild ones.” By the 18th century the Indians were known as the Seminole, and they stuck like a fish bone in the throat of American might. In 1819 the U.S. acquired Florida from
Spain for five million dollars, then dropped more than $30 million on the Seminole Wars. When the gore ended, about 4,000 had been exiled to what is now Oklahoma, and maybe 300 remained hiding in the swamp. For most of the 20th century their descendants eked out a living as tourist attractions around Miami or in the Everglades, wrestling alligators, performing dances, and making trinkets for visitors.

The big turnaround came in 1988, when Indian gambling was sanctioned. Today every man, woman, and child in the tribe of 3,500 members receives a healthy percentage of casino profits. In December 2006 the tribe cut a $965-million deal that bought up almost all of the Hard Rock Cafes and casinos in the world.

This prosperity is allowing them to save a fragment of the Big Cypress that was never developed because it was unsuitable for agriculture; citrus groves, cattle farms, and vegetable fields cover the rest of the reservation. “That means bringing back more of the animals, giving it the traditional look of the land,” says Brian Zepeda, director of Florida Seminole Tourism. “The cypress trees were once so large and dense they formed like a fort created by nature.”

Zepeda leads the way through the swamp, carrying a machete to help clear a path. Sabal palms, pop ashes, and willows share the space with the cypresses. It is early in the dry season, and the ground underfoot feels firm, though it buckles in the low, wet spots. Deer dart on the edge of the forest, and a remnant of the endangered Florida panthers—maybe 20 of a possible state population of a hundred—holds out on the Big Cypress Reservation.

Wild sour oranges, introduced by the Spaniards, persist as well. The Seminoles roast them to bring out their sweetness. In one part of the reservation that’s under restoration is a raised spot in the marsh, a former settlement where natives hid from soldiers in the safety of trees at the end of the last Seminole War.

Zepeda says he used to wrestle alligators. “But I got older, and the alligators still stayed young,” he says.

And that is the song of the Big Cypress and the Everglades—the nation got older, and this land, now coming back around the abandoned village, recalls a world that was newer and fresher.

The project covers little more than 2,000 acres, compared with the entire Everglades, which comprise more than four million. And it is migrant laborers, not Seminoles themselves, who have been hired to remove the exotic species. (This is also true at Santa Clara Pueblo.) It would be easy to dismiss the effort as a tiny gesture.

But this would hardly be the attitude of an alligator or a cypress.

In a canal snaking around the area under restoration, an alligator leaps from the water in the sunlight and snatches a fish. The canal, part of the huge water-drainage effort that destroyed much of the Everglades, is little more than an industrial ditch. And yet the alligator lives here, beautiful as it arcs in the light—wild,
throbbing life in a world going to concrete, condos, and freeways.

© 2010 National Geographic Society. All rights reserved.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2010/08/native-lands/bowden-text/1

No union affiliation with ALP!

Union Members

I have just read the online petition about “Community and Public Sector Union Affiliation” at: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/cpsu/

The petition says,

To:  Stephen Jones, National Secretary, CPSU

As members of the CPSU, we request that the National Secretary obtain the opinion of members by plebiscite on the following question:

“Do you support the CPSU having a policy of no formal affiliations with any political party?”

There should be no union affiliation with any political party.

Ian Curr, May 2007

Change without a strong Workers Movement?

A recent petition to G8 Summit stated:

‘HURRY, only 72 hours to help fight for the end of world poverty’.g8_advert_portrt_en_lo_v2.jpg

‘The standard of health of Aborigines lags almost 100 years behind that of other Australians, according to the World Health Organisation. Some indigenous people still suffer from leprosy, rheumatic heart disease and tuberculosis. A similar survey from Oxfam and the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation reported that Australia ranked last for health among rich countries with indigenous populations’. (International edition The Guardian Weekly, London, 11 May 2007).

Yet I received the following email from within Australia: “We are fortunate enough not to know the experience of extreme poverty first hand, therefore, it is our duty to use our blessed position in the world to help in whatever way we can.” — Petition titled ‘HURRY, only 72 hours to help fight the end of world poverty’.

The person who wrote this email in support of the above petition is clearly fortunate enough not to have visited places where many working class people live: Logan City in Brisbane, or ‘the Block’ in Abercrombie St, Redfern, or Marrickville in Sydney, Walgett in western NSW (the most racist town in Australia), or downtown Alice Springs, or Palm Island, or Hopevale mission in Nth Qld , or parts of Dunwich on Straddie, and so on.

The third world is at our doorstep, we know it, yet do nothing. It never features in election outcomes for local, state, or federal elections. The parties wring their hands and ignore it. Labor Prime Minister Paul Keating made the famous Redfern speech in the early 1990s and then made economic plans to ensure the survival of poverty in Australia.

On the southside, darkside
South of the freeway them Logan kids
Use to hang out in that trashed out Rooster & Ribs

Fast food, junk food, foul, food, chunder
McDonalds, Kentucky, rail line thunder
Tavern drive-in, ya buy the piss
The grog we flog, they’ll never miss
Poor behind, square one, it’s hard to start
Five fingered discount from the rich K-Mart

– Kev Carmody, aboriginal singer and activist, from Darkside

Contrast this with the case of

“Nicki Webster representing ‘Young Australia’ (in terms of settler history and in a generational sense) in the Opening Ceremony of the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games only a few kilometres from the Block in Redfern..

She is an image of an innocent white Australia and, as a child, it is difficult to associate her with colonial violence, frontier conflict and cultural genocide.

What she can be seen to represent, however, is a representation of a settler desire to find a blank slate, a pure, unadulterated white canvas with which to start again.” – Kev Carmody, comments on ‘One night the Moon’

Gallery

Pig City: ‘they shut it down, they pulled it down’?

This gallery contains 3 photos.

How does the song go? Watch the butcher shine his knives And this town is full of battered wives ……………………………………. They shut it down They pulled it down They shut it down They pulled it down Round and round, up … Continue reading

‘New Labor’ or solidarity?

In 1980 when Howard was Treasurer, the Fraser Government tried to tax mining workers on the benefit they received from subsidised housing in remote Central Queensland. A form of Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) on housing paid by the workers themselves.

As a recent article on the Miners Union (CFMEU-mining division) website points out:

The Fraser Government had first tried to introduce the housing tax in 1978 and again in 1979 but through strike action were successfully rebuked both times. However, Howard thought that the time was right for another attack on workers rights and in 1980 the battle was on again.

The response from the miners was to go out on strike, this is why John Howard hates unions —

When Howard moved to impose his housing tax on 30 June, miners at Gregory and Moura mines went out on strike. Others at Moranbah and Dysart followed.

Around 4,000 mining families in Central Queensland were targeted by Howard’s housing tax and they were prepared to fight for their rights.

Mass meetings and a street march in Moura (at the time illegal under Premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen’s anti-civil rights laws) were held. Interestingly, Bjelke-Petersen supported the miners opposition to the tax, but when he attended a mass meeting in Blackwater and told the striking miners to return to work, he was booed and jeered.

In other parts of Queensland miners not involved in the dispute rallied behind their comrades. In Collinsville and Ipswich levies were struck in support…

In August, into the seventh week of the strike, Deputy Prime Minister Doug Anthony and Treasurer John Howard clashed with miners at a Blackwater meeting.

The dispute was estimated to be costing coal companies $28 million a week and $5 million a week in lost corporate tax. And yet the Government was holding out for an estimated $1.5 million in increased tax revenue.

Finally, in September, after 10-weeks on strike … the miners returned to work victorious.

The victory did not end there, as there was a flow on to other communities.

At the beginning of October, with a Federal election looming, the Fraser Government announced that families living in remote areas all over Australia would receive tax reductions on housing provided by employers.

The mining unions tamed

Contrast this to the recent dispute over housing reported in Common Cause under the heading — BHP must end housing discrimination in Central Queensland.

The article reads:

In the minds of greedy coal companies, mining towns like Moranbah only exist to support them. But to the workers who have helped build these communities, it is our home, it is where we nurture and sustain our families.

… BHP can afford to do the right thing by all its workers, their families and our community. BHP Billiton has just recorded the biggest ever profit in Australia’s history – $13.7 Billion.

Most of that staggering profit came from its mining operations and much of it from coal mines in Central Queensland.

Labor’s response:

Beattie to focus on coal town problems

Queensland Premier Peter Beattie has confirmed he will send the directors-general of key government departments to coalmining towns to see infrastructure problems first hand…

A group of six mayors and Labor backbencher and former coal miner Jim Pearce have been pushing for the meeting so politicians can gain a better understanding of the housing and infrastructure problems facing the coal mining communities of Central Queensland.”
C F M E U Mining and Energy Bulletin, 6 September 2006 Volume 9, No.15.

During the 1980s the Labor Party delivered aspirational voters to the Liberal Party. The Accord between government employers and workers produced a 15 percent decline in wages over the decade Labor was in office.

In the 2004 federal election election many members of the CFMEU forestry division in Tasmania voted Liberal. Many workers left their union.

To get the workers back in the fold Labor led unions have resorted to gimmicks like union shopper, advertising, and fear of WorkChoices legislation.

But as pointed out in a recent article Industrial Relations: Howard’s Grave Diggers by Michael Connors in Australian Independent Marxists Newsletter May 2007:may-day-2007-086.jpg

The greatest challenge facing Australian unions is not recruitment but the re-creation of the notion of solidarity. While unions will grow in the short term — based on the fear of Howard’s IR agenda — recruitment will mean nothing unless the ethic of solidarity re-emerges.

The mineworkers tax revolt in 1980 is one example of the kind of solidarity that has to be re-built, where union power is exercised by the workers themselves.

Philistines no longer at the gates…

Academics, Hookham and MacLennan, threatened with the sack!

I have just received a paper from the National Tertiary Education Union [NTEU] about closure of the Humanities and Human Services School at Queensland University of Technology.

The letter states:

The argument that Creative Industries is the ‘new’ humanities is spurious – the programmes are important to QUT but are not intended to the breadth and depth of the (humanities degrees) BA & B.Soc Sci. Indeed, much of the argument about the ‘new’ revolves around the apparent audacity of comparing Shakespeare and Big Brother … the undergraduate degrees and the postgraduate research at Humanities and Human Services … is grappling with the complex human, social and ethical issues and uncertainties faced in science and bio-medicine, business, built environment, law and education.

Are students and staff aware of the attacks being made against two academics in Creative Industries at QUT, John Hookham and Gary MacLennan, who wrote a critical article ‘Philistines of relativism at the gates‘, about a PhD thesis called ‘Laughing at the Disabled: Creating comedy that Confronts, Offends and Entertains‘.

Their criticism of ‘Laughing at the Disabled …’ has been covered widely in the higher education supplement of the Murdoch newspaper, The Australian.

It is clear that, for some, there is a point at which we can tolerate no more.

Sadly, in these times, it seems it is difficult to coordinate this into collective action rather than individual revolt.

What collective action is to be organised by union members for John Hookham and Gary MacLennan, now charged under QUT Code of Conduct and apparently threatened with the sack?

It seems the philistines are no longer at the gates, they run the institutions and, as always, those who oppose them are to be arrested and shut outside.

Ian Curr,
May 2007

Protests and arrests at Gardens Point Campus as students demonstrate the closing of the School of Humanities and Human Services

Since this article was written there has been some support for the two academics, MacLennan and Hookham.

Also there has been the parallel action by the QUT to get rid of Humanities.

This has met with some resistance by the students and staff at QUT.

The university response to that resistance is shown in the video below.

The video is short and worth watching right to the end.

Congratulations to the student activists and filmaker for courage and determination ‘under fire’ from police and University authorities. We need to see more students standing up for a better education and making videos like this available on You Tube.

Ian Curr
July 2007

Labor’s Industrial Relations Policy — May, 2007

The following is a summary of the Industrial Relations (IR) Policy accepted at the National Labor Party Conference in April 2007. It is included here in the interest of clarity and completeness.

I have summarised the Labor’s IR policy directly from the ALP policy document ‘Forward with Fairness’[1].

I do not agree with this policy imposed on workers in the interests of managing capitalism. It should be noted that there is no mention in the ALP policy document of the ban placed on union secondary boycotts in the Trade Practices Act 1974.

However, to avoid confusion about the content of the IR policy passed at ALP National Conference on 28 April 2007, I have refrained from making comment here. Nevertheless, in a couple of places only, I have distinguished its content from existing IR policy under the current federal government.

Proposed National Industrial Relations System

  1. One National System for the Private Sector using co-operation and referral of powers by the Labor States (currently all states and territorities). Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) and other agencies (Fair Pay Commission, Office of Employment Advocate etc) to be replaced by Fair Work Australia.
  2. Fair Work Australia will include a separate division with jurisdiction to hear and determine unlawful dismissal claims, matters relating to Labor’s minimum entitlements and freedom of association.
  3. Pattern bargaining. The policy is worded as follows “Where more than one employer and their workers or unions with coverage in the workplaces voluntarily agree to collectively bargain together for a single agreement they will be free to do so”.
  4. Abolishes Australian Building & Construction Commission (ABCC). However Fair Work Australia’s inspectorate will have specialist divisions and the first two will be for building and hospitality industries.

Collective bargaining

Collective bargaining is based at the enterprise level. It includes the following aspects:

  1. No statutory individual contracts i.e. Australian Workplace Agreements AWAs
  2. Collective agreements permit:
  • parties to break off negotiations, in which case the industrial arrangements already in place would remain in force;
  • requests for Fair Work Australia to help reach agreement
  • requests for determination of particular matters; or
  • in certain circumstances, permits taking protected industrial action (see conditions below).
  • Parties must bargaining in good faith;

Industrial Action

  1. No strike without a secret ballot.
  2. Workers can take protected industrial action.
  3. The ballot process will be supervised by Fair Work Australia.
  4. Unlawful for employers to pay strike pay.
  5. Employers may lock out workers in response to industrial action by those workers.
  6. Fair Work Australia will have the power to end the industrial action and determine a settlement between the parties for their workplace

Legislated Minimum standards

The existing 5 minimum standards under WorkChoices of the 38 hour week, 4 weeks annual leave, sick leave, parental leave and carers leave, and public holidays have been increased to 10 standards outlined below:

1. Hours of work — 38 hour week for full time workers. Workers may be required to work additional hours, but cannot be required to work unreasonable additional hours.

2. Parental leave —both parents entitled to up to 12 months of unpaid leave associated with the birth of a baby. Also chief care giver to child may be entitled to additional 12 months of unpaid parental leave from their employer.

3. Flexible work for parents — right for parents to request flexible work arrangements until their child reaches school age.

4. Annual leave — 4 weeks’ paid annual leave for full time workers. Part time workers paid pro rata. Shift workers entitled to additional paid week of annual leave.

5. Personal, Carers and Compassionate leave— 10 days’ paid carers leave each year. Part time workers leave paid pro rata. Compassionate leave on the death or serious illness of a family member or a person the worker lives with. Additional 2 days of unpaid personal leave where required for genuine caring purposes and family emergencies.

6. Community Service Leave
Paid community service leave for jury service and unpaid leave for emergency services duties.

7. Public holidays
Labor’s industrial relations system will guarantee public holidays. Workers entitled to penalty rates on public holidays as set out in the award.

8. Information in the workplace
Employers to provide information about the worker’s rights and entitlements at work, including the right of the worker to join a union.

9. Termination of Employment & Redundancy
All workers will be entitled to fair notice of termination

10. Long Service Leave

Industry Awards

As well the ALP policy outlines minimum industry award conditions including:

1. Minimum wages. Based on skill classifications and career structures, incentive based payments and bonuses, wage rates and other arrangements for apprentices and trainees;
2. The type of work performed, conditions vary if the worker is permanent or casual, and flexible working arrangements, particularly for workers with family responsibilities, including part time employment and job sharing;
3. Arrangements for when work is performed, including hours of work, rostering, rest
breaks and meal breaks;
4. Overtime rates for workers on long hours;
5. Penalty rates for workers doing shifts or working on unsocial, irregular or unpredictable hours, on weekends or public holidays.
6. Minimum annualised wage in lieu of penalty rates where patterns of work in an occupation, industry or enterprise. Workers not to be disadvantaged;
7. Allowances including reimbursement of expenses, higher duties and disability based payments;
8. Leave, leave loadings and the arrangements for taking leave;
9. Superannuation; and
10. Dispute settling procedures.

Unfair Dismissal

Claims for unfair dismissal may be permitted on the following conditions:

  1. where there are 15 or more workers, must have worked for 6 months;
  2. where there are fewer than 15 workers, must have worked for 12 months;
  3. if the worker is not covered by an award, the worker must be earning annual remuneration of less than $98,200 (to be indexed).
  4. 7 days to lodge claimRemedy for unfair dismissal may be reinstatement or compensation. There will be a cap on compensation paid.


[1] Published at http://www.alp.org.au/media/0407/msirloo280.php . Website checked on 2 May 2007.

Unions have lost rights at work — will workers lose all?

In the lead up to the ALP national conference it is claimed that “The ALP is strongly defending workers RIGHTS at WORK”

This is not true in any sense. 310623515_683e3bc353.jpg

ALP-led unions have resisted actions to defend workers rights at work, they have presided over losses since the 1998 MUA Dispute.

ALP governments and ALP-led unions have mounted a failed legal challenge that their own lawyers said would be defeated in the HIGH Court. As a result of that legal action and the following decision workers lost rights at work.

The ACTU has raised $20 million from workers in its ‘Your Right at Work’ campaign. Not one cent of that money has been spent on fighting WorkChoices; it has all gone to advertising to assist the ALP to win government. Look at union delegates who have been sacked as a result of WorkChoices. The union delegate at Tristar was sacked after 32 years in the job for standing up for his fellow workers. No industrial action was called.

Many other workers have lost jobs in the retail, hospitality and tourism sectors. The only way to fight for rights at work in the hospitality industry is by unions applying secondary boycotts. Not one secondary boycott has been organised under the ALP parliamentary strategy.

The Electrical Trades Union in Brisbane organised pickets of the Fox hotel when management forced workers onto Australian Workplace Agreements. These boycotts were effective in getting a union collective agreement. But the ACTU has resisted the lead of the ETU-style campaign by calling for secondary boycotts.

All the ACTU has done is organise protests to help the ALP win government.

Remember an ALP win under Rudd promises little. Last time workers and their unions lost more under the Accord and Enterprise Bargaining introduced by the Hawke/Keating Labor Government than under the long years of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 introduced by the coalition government (1996- ).

Many workers are now giving up on unions because of the ALP failure to fight the coalition government on WorkChoices. If the ALP has fought as is claimed, where is a single victory for workers since WorkChoices was introduced. Not one strike has been called by ALP-led unions. Industrial Action is at its lowest since 1913. As a result union participation is down to 15% in the private sector.

Even if the ALP did want to change WorkChoices significantly, a parliamentary solution is high risk for workers rights at work because the ALP will not control the upper house regardless of who wins government in 2007.

Ian Curr
12 April 2007

The Day of the Political Street March

The Day of the Political Street March is over, don’t apply for a permit you won’t get one” — Premier of Queensland, Johannes Bjelke-Petersen on 4 September 1977.

In response to the ban on political marches, I helped paint the “Ban Bjelke Banner” (shown) with another student in the forum area of the Student Union at University of Queensland on the morning of 12 September 1977.

We (and others) carried it at the front of the first street march held on that day in defiance of Bjelke-Petersen’s ban on street marches. The film of that first march of defiance was shown on TV news and current affairs for many years afterwards (see pictured). This is because over 3,000 arrests occurred as a result of defiance of the ban by workers and students in the period 1977-1979. That struggle is why political street marches are allowed today by governments in Queensland.

People should not surrender their democratic rights to any government or institution.

ban-bjelke-the-first-street-march-banner.jpg

Soon after Bjelke-Petersen’s death in April 2005, the Beattie Labor Government granted Bjelke Petersen a state funeral.

On May Day 2005, just prior to the state funeral, I took the “Ban Bjelke” banner to the annual Labour Day march in Brisbane. I asked people who were arrested in the street marches to sign the banner. I received a lot of support from unionists and activists. Daughters and sons of street marchers proudly came up to sign the banner on behalf of their parents who had marched in defiance of the ban on street marches.

In protest of the Labor government’s granting Bjelke-Petersen a state funeral, Murri activists, SEQEB workers, and street marchers carried the banner onto Brisbane streets for the last time, almost 30 years after its first appearance in defiance of the ban on street marches (see below).

ban-bjelke-2005.JPG

We chanted “Never Forgive, Never Forget, Never Again” all the way to parliament house.

In 2006, the Brisbane City Council’s Museum of Brisbane “Taking to the Streets” exhibition displayed the banner now displaying over 230 signatures to remember those struggles.

It should be remembered that one street marcher, the former Senator George Georges, was threatened with dis-endorsement by the Labor Party-in-opposition in 1977 if he spoke at the rally on 11 November 1977 prior to the state election on the following day.

Ian Curr, 25 March 2007

40th anniversary of the victory of the 1967 referendum

 

The headlines on Friday, March 23, 2007 read “Four acquitted over Palm Island riot” [The Age], “Not Guilty” [The Courier Mail] and so on.

Bruce long - Courier Mail

What the papers do not say is that the Queensland Government had been successful in getting longer sentences against other Palm Islanders trying to rid their island of police aggression and killing. To do that government has played on the racist fears of the public, the police union, and the judiciary.

In giving his reasons for increasing the sentences against three Palm Islanders last December Queensland’s chief justice made reference to so-called ‘victim impact statements’. One police officer said in his statement that he (and presumably his fellow officers) had decided (if necessary) to fire on the Palm Island gathering after the white-wash by the first inquest of Mulrunji ‘s killing. The policeman made this written statement:

“… I made a cold, logical decision to fire into a large crowd if necessary with obvious consequences (it) has caused me much angst since. I often reflect on how much bigger this whole sorry Palm Island saga would have been if that lock (to the firearms cabinet) had given away and we had ended up firing into the crowd, killing God knows how many people.” in R v Poynter, Norman & Parker; ex parte A-G (Qld) [2006] QCA 517 at [29]

Three Palm Islanders are still serving time in prison as a result of the Queensland Government’s appeal against their original sentences.

Yet a jury acquitted four palm islanders of riot in a four week trial that ended yesterday (22 March 2007).

Lex Wotton, a respected leader of the community, goes to trial soon on similar charges. He will be the last Palm Islander to face charges arising out of the community’s concern over the killing of Mulrunji in November 2003. Legal argument continues next week over his plea.

Senior Sgt Hurley is yet to face trial over charges of the manslaughter of Mulrunji. His trial is scheduled to start in Townsville in April 2007.